Logo Apl Bible
Ikon Carian

Ruth 3

3
Naomi Instructs Ruth
1 At that time,#tn The phrase ā€œsometime laterā€ does not appear in Hebrew but is supplied to mark the implicit shift in time from the events in chapter 2. Naomi, her mother-in-law, said to her, ā€œMy daughter, I must find a home for you so you will be secure.#tn Heb ā€œMy daughter, should I not seek for you a resting place so that it may go well for you [or which will be good for you]?ā€ The idiomatic, negated rhetorical question is equivalent to an affirmation (see 2:8-9) and has thus been translated in the affirmative (so also NAB, NCV, NRSV, TEV, CEV, NLT). 2 Now Boaz, with whose female servants you worked, is our close relative.#tn Heb ā€œIs not Boaz our close relative, with whose female servants you were?ā€ The idiomatic, negated rhetorical question is equivalent to an affirmation (see Ruth 2:8-9; 3:1) and has thus been translated in the affirmative (so also NCV, NRSV, TEV, CEV, NLT). Look, tonight he is winnowing barley at the threshing floor.#tn Heb ā€œlook, he is winnowing the barley threshing floor tonight.ā€sn Winnowing the threshed grain involved separating the kernels of grain from the straw and chaff. The grain would be thrown into the air, allowing the wind to separate the kernels (see O. Borowski, Agriculture in Iron Age Israel, 65-66). The threshing floor itself was usually located outside town in a place where the prevailing west wind could be used to advantage (Borowski, 62-63). 3 So bathe yourself,#tn The perfect with prefixed vav (ו) consecutive here introduces a series of instructions. See GKC 335 §112.aa for other examples of this construction. rub on some perfumed oil,#tn For the meaning of the verb הוּךְ (sukh), see HALOT 745-46 s.v. II הוך, and F. W. Bush, Ruth, Esther (WBC), 150. Cf. NAB, NRSV ā€œanoint yourselfā€; NIV ā€œperfume yourselfā€; NLT ā€œput on perfume.ā€ and get dressed up.#tc The consonantal text (Kethib) has the singular ×©×‚Ö“×žÖ°×œÖ¹×ŖÖµ×šÖ° (simlotekh, ā€œyour outer garmentā€), while the marginal reading (Qere) has the plural ×©×‚Ö“×žÖ°×œÖ¹×ŖÖ·×™Ö“×šÖ° (simlotayikh) which might function as a plural of number (ā€œyour outer garmentsā€) or a plural of composition (ā€œyour outer garment [composed of several parts]).ā€tn Heb ā€œand put your outer garment on yourselfā€; NAB ā€œput on your best attire.ā€ The noun ×©×‚Ö“×žÖ°×œÖø×” (simlah) may refer to clothes in general (see R. L. Hubbard, Jr., Ruth [NICOT], 197, n. 7) or a long outer garment (see F. W. Bush, Ruth, Esther [WBC], 150-51). Mourners often wore mourning clothes and refrained from washing or using cosmetics (Gen 38:14, 19; 2 Sam 12:20; 14:2), so Ruth’s attire and appearance would signal that her period of mourning was over and she was now available for remarriage (see Bush, 152). Then go down#tc The consonantal text (Kethib) has וְיָרַדְתּ֓י (vĆæyaradtiy, ā€œthen I will go downā€; Qal perfect 1st person common singular), while the marginal reading (Qere) is וְיָרַדְתְּ (vĆæyaradt, ā€œthen you go downā€; Qal perfect 2nd person feminine singular) which makes more much sense in context. It is possible that the Kethib preserves an archaic spelling of the 2nd person feminine singular form (see F. W. Bush, Ruth, Esther [WBC], 144-45). to the threshing floor. But don’t let the man know you’re there until he finishes his meal.#tn Heb ā€œuntil he finishes eating and drinkingā€; NASB, NIV, NRSV, TEV, CEV ā€œuntil he has finished.ā€ 4 When he gets ready to go to sleep,#tn Heb ā€œand let it be when he lies downā€; NAB ā€œBut when he lies down.ā€ take careful notice of the place where he lies down. Then go, uncover his legs,#tn Some define the noun ×žÖ·×ØÖ°×’Ö¼Ö°×œ×•Ö¹×Ŗ (margĆælot) as ā€œthe place for the feetā€ (see HALOT 631 s.v.; cf. KJV, NASB, NIV, NRSV, NLT), but in Dan 10:6 the word refers to the legs, or ā€œregion of the legs.ā€ For this reason ā€œlegsā€ or ā€œlower bodyā€ is the preferred translation (see F. W. Bush, Ruth, Esther [WBC], 152). Because ā€œfootā€ is sometimes used euphemistically for the genitals, some feel that Ruth uncovered Boaz’s genitals. For a critique of this view see Bush, 153. While Ruth and Boaz did not actually have a sexual encounter at the threshing floor, there is no doubt that Ruth’s actions are symbolic and constitute a marriage proposal. and lie down#tc The consonantal text (Kethib) has וְשָׁכָבְתּ֓י (vĆæshakhavtiy, ā€œthen I will lie downā€; Qal perfect 1st person common singular), while the marginal reading (Qere) is וְשָׁכָבְתְּ (vĆæshakhavt, ā€œthen you lie downā€; Qal perfect 2nd person feminine singular) which makes more sense. It is possible that the Kethib preserves an archaic spelling of the 2nd person feminine singular form (see F. W. Bush, Ruth, Esther [WBC], 144-45). beside him.#tn The words ā€œbeside himā€ are supplied in the translation for stylistic reasons; cf. NLT ā€œlie down there.ā€ He will tell#tn The disjunctive clause structure (vav [ו] + subject + verb) highlights this final word of instruction or signals the conclusion of the instructions. you what you should do.ā€ 5 Ruth replied to Naomi,#tn Heb ā€œshe said to her.ā€ The referents (Ruth and Naomi) have been specified in the translation for clarity. ā€œI will do everything you have told#tn The Hebrew imperfect is used, even though Naomi’s instructions appear to be concluded. The imperfect can sometimes express actions which although (strictly speaking) are already finished, yet are regarded as still lasting into the present, or continuing to operate in it (GKC 316 §107.h). me#tc The MT (Kethib) lacks the preposition אֵלַי (’elay, ā€œto meā€) which is attested in the marginal reading (Qere). Many medieval Hebrew mss agree with the marginal reading (Qere) by including the phrase. to do.ā€#tn Heb ā€œeverything which you are saying I will do.ā€ The Hebrew word order emphasizes Ruth’s intention to follow Naomi’s instructions to the letter.
Ruth Visits Boaz
6 So she went down to the threshing floor and did everything her mother-in-law had instructed her to do.#tn Heb ā€œand she did according to all which her mother-in-law commanded herā€ (NASB similar). Verse 6 is a summary statement, while the following verses (vv. 7-15) give the particulars. 7 When Boaz had finished his meal and was feeling satisfied, he lay down to sleep at the far end of the grain heap.#tn Heb ā€œand Boaz ate and drank and his heart was well and he went to lie down at the end of the heapā€; NAB ā€œat the edge of the sheaves.ā€ Then Ruth#tn Heb ā€œsheā€; the referent (Ruth) has been specified in the translation for clarity. crept up quietly,#sn Ruth must have waited until Boaz fell asleep, for he does not notice when she uncovers his legs and lies down beside him. uncovered his legs,#tn See the note on the word ā€œlegsā€ in v. 4. and lay down beside him.#tn The words ā€œbeside himā€ are supplied in the translation for stylistic reasons. Cf. TEV ā€œat his feetā€; CEV ā€œnear his feet.ā€ 8 In the middle of the night he was startled#tn Heb ā€œtrembled, shudderedā€; CEV, NLT ā€œsuddenly woke up.ā€ Perhaps he shivered because he was chilled. and turned over.#tn The verb לָפַת (lafat) occurs only here, Job 6:18, and Judg 16:29 (where it seems to mean ā€œgrab hold ofā€). Here the verb seems to carry the meaning ā€œbend, twist, turn,ā€ like its Arabic cognate (see HALOT 533 s.v. לפת, and F. W. Bush, Ruth, Esther [WBC], 163). Now#tn Heb ā€œand beholdā€ (so KJV, NASB). The narrator invites the reader to view the situation through Boaz’s eyes. he saw a woman#sn Now he saw a woman. The narrator writes from Boaz’s perspective. Both the narrator and the reader know the night visitor is Ruth, but from Boaz’s perspective she is simply ā€œa woman.ā€ lying beside him!#tn Heb ā€œ[at] his legs.ā€ See the note on the word ā€œlegsā€ in v. 4. 9 He said, ā€œWho are you?ā€#tn When Boaz speaks, he uses the feminine form of the pronoun, indicating that he knows she is a woman. She replied, ā€œI am Ruth, your servant.#tn Here Ruth uses ×Öø×žÖø×” (’amah), a more elevated term for a female servant than שׁ֓פְחָה (shifkhah), the word used in 2:13. In Ruth 2, where Ruth has just arrived from Moab and is very much aware of her position as a foreigner (v. 10), she acknowledges Boaz’s kindness and emphasizes her own humility by using the term שׁ֓פְחָה, though she admits that she does not even occupy that lowly position on the social scale. However, here in chap. 3, where Naomi sends her to Boaz to seek marriage, she uses the more elevated term ×Öø×žÖø×” to describe herself because she is now aware of Boaz’s responsibility as a close relative of her deceased husband and she wants to challenge him to fulfill his obligation. In her new social context she is dependent on Boaz (hence the use of ×Öø×žÖø×”), but she is no mere שׁ֓פְחָה. Marry your servant,#tn Heb ā€œand spread your wing [or skirt] over your servant.ā€ Many medieval Hebrew mss have the plural/dual ā€œyour wingsā€ rather than the singular ā€œyour wing, skirt.ā€ The latter is more likely here in the context of Ruth’s marriage proposal. In the metaphorical account in Ezek 16:8, God spreads his skirt over naked Jerusalem as an act of protection and as a precursor to marriage. Thus Ruth’s words can be taken, in effect, as a marriage proposal (and are so translated here; cf. TEV ā€œSo please marry meā€). See F. W. Bush, Ruth, Esther (WBC), 164-65. for you are a guardian of the family interests.ā€#tn Heb ā€œfor you are a גֹאֵל [go’el],ā€ sometimes translated ā€œredeemerā€ (cf. NIV ā€œa kinsman-redeemerā€; NLT ā€œmy family redeemerā€). In this context Boaz, as a ā€œredeemer,ā€ functions as a guardian of the family interests who has responsibility for caring for the widows of his deceased kinsmen. For a discussion of the legal background, see F. W. Bush, Ruth, Esther (WBC), 166-69.sn By proposing marriage, Ruth goes beyond the letter of Naomi’s instructions (see v. 4, where Naomi told Ruth that Boaz would tell her what to do). Though she is more aggressive than Naomi told her to be, she is still carrying out the intent of Naomi’s instructions, which were designed to lead to marriage. 10 He said, ā€œMay you be rewarded#tn Or ā€œblessedā€ (so NASB, NRSV). by the Lord, my dear!#tn Heb ā€œmy daughter.ā€ This form of address is a mild form of endearment, perhaps merely rhetorical. A few English versions omit it entirely (e.g., TEV, CEV). The same expression occurs in v. 11. This act of devotion#tn Heb ā€œlatter [act of] devotionā€; NRSV ā€œthis last instance of your loyalty.ā€ is greater than what you did before.#tn Heb ā€œyou have made the latter act of devotion better than the formerā€; NIV ā€œthan that which you showed earlier.ā€sn Greater than what you did before. Ruth’s former act of devotion was her decision to remain and help Naomi. The latter act of devotion is her decision to marry Boaz to provide a child to carry on her deceased husband’s (and Elimelech’s) line and to provide for Naomi in her old age (see Ruth 4:5, 10, 15). For you have not sought to marry#tn Heb ā€œby not going after the young menā€ (NASB similar); TEV ā€œYou might have gone looking for a young man.ā€ one of the young men, whether rich or poor.#tn Heb ā€œwhether poor or richā€ (so KJV, NAB, NASB, NRSV); the more common English idiom reverses the order (ā€œrich or poorā€; cf. NIV, NCV, TEV, CEV, NLT).sn Whether rich or poor. This statement seems to indicate that Ruth could have married anyone. However, only by marrying a גֹּאֵל (go’el, ā€œfamily guardianā€; traditionally ā€œredeemerā€) could she carry on her dead husband’s line and make provision for Naomi. 11 Now, my dear, don’t worry!#tn Heb ā€œdo not fearā€ (so NASB); NRSV ā€œdo not be afraid.ā€ I intend to do for you everything you propose,#tn Heb ā€œeverything which you are saying I will do for you.ā€ The Hebrew word order emphasizes Boaz’s intention to fulfill Ruth’s request. As in v. 5, the Hebrew imperfect is used (note ā€œyou are sayingā€), even though Ruth’s request appears to be concluded. According to GKC 316 §107.h, the imperfect can sometimes ā€œexpress actions, etc., which although, strictly speaking, they are already finished, are regarded as still lasting on into the present time, or continuing to operate in it.ā€ The imperfect אֶעֱשֶׂה (’e’eseh) could be translated ā€œI will doā€ (so NAB, NIV, NRSV, NLT), but since there are legal complications which must first be resolved, it is better to take the form as indicating Boaz’s desire or intention, if the legal matters can be worked out. for everyone in the village#tn Heb ā€œall the gate of the town,ā€ which by metonymy could refer to everyone in town (NIV ā€œAll my fellow townsmenā€; NLT ā€œeveryone in townā€), or only to the leaders and prominent citizens of the community (Boaz’s peers) who transacted business and made legal decisions at the town gate (NRSV ā€œall the assembly of my peopleā€). knows that you are a worthy woman.#tn Or ā€œwoman of strong characterā€ (cf. NIV ā€œwoman of noble characterā€). The same phrase is used in Prov 31:10 to describe the ideal wife. Prov 31 emphasizes the ideal wife’s industry, her devotion to her family, and her concern for others, characteristics which Ruth had demonstrated. 12 Now yes, it is true that#tc The sequence ×›Ö¼Ö“×™ ×Öø×žÖ°× Öø× ×›Ö¼Ö“×™ א֓ם (ki ’omnam ki ’im; Kethib) occurs only here in the OT, as does the sequence ×›Ö¼Ö“×™ ×Öø×žÖ°× Öø× ×›Ö¼Ö“×™ (Qere). It is likely that ×›Ö¼Ö“×™ א֓ם is dittographic (note the preceding sequence ×›Ö¼Ö“×™ ×Öø×žÖ°× Öø×). The translation assumes that the original text was simply the otherwise unattested וְעַתָּה ×›Ö¼Ö“×™ ×Öø×žÖ°× Öø×, with ×Öø×žÖ°× Öø× and ×›Ö¼Ö“×™ both having an asseverative (or emphatic) function. I am a guardian,#tn Sometimes translated ā€œredeemerā€ (also later in this verse). See the note on the phrase ā€œguardian of the family interestsā€ in v. 9. but there is another guardian who is a closer relative than I am. 13 Remain here tonight. Then in the morning, if he agrees to marry you,#tn Heb ā€œif he redeems youā€; NIV ā€œif he wants to redeemā€; NRSV ā€œif he will act as next-of-kin for you.ā€ The verb גֹּאֵל (go’el) here refers generally to fulfilling his responsibilities as a guardian of the family interests. In this case it specifically entails marrying Ruth. fine,#tn Or ā€œgoodā€ (so NAB, NASB, NIV, NRSV); TEV ā€œwell and good.ā€ let him do so.#tn Heb ā€œlet him redeemā€ (so NIV); NLT ā€œthen let him marry you.ā€ But if he does not want to do so, I promise, as surely as the Lord lives, to marry you.#tn Heb ā€œbut if he does not want to redeem you, then I will redeem you, I, [as] the Lord livesā€ (NASB similar). Sleep here until morning.ā€#sn Sleep here. Perhaps Boaz tells her to remain at the threshing floor because he is afraid she might be hurt wandering back home in the dark. See Song 5:7 and R. L. Hubbard, Jr., Ruth (NICOT), 218. 14 So she slept beside him#tc The consonantal text (Kethib) has the singular ×žÖ·×ØÖ°×’Ö¼Ö°×œÖø×ŖÖ·×• (margĆælatav, ā€œhis legā€), while the marginal reading (Qere) has the plural ×žÖ·×ØÖ°×’Ö¼Ö°×œ×•Ö¹×ŖÖø×™×• (margĆælotayv, ā€œhis legsā€). tn Heb ā€œ[at] his legs.ā€ See the note on the word ā€œlegsā€ in v. 4. until morning. She woke up while it was still dark.#tn Heb ā€œand she arose before a man could recognize his companionā€; NRSV ā€œbefore one person could recognize anotherā€; CEV ā€œbefore daylight.ā€ Boaz thought,#tn Heb ā€œand he saidā€ (so KJV, NASB, NIV). Some translate ā€œhe thought [to himself]ā€ (cf. NCV). ā€œNo one must know that a woman visited the threshing floor.ā€#tn Heb ā€œlet it not be known that the woman came [to] the threshing floorā€ (NASB similar). The article on הָא֓שָּׁה (ha’ishah, ā€œthe womanā€) is probably dittographic (note the final he on the preceding verb בָאָה [va’ah, ā€œshe cameā€]). 15 Then he said, ā€œHold out the shawl#tn Or ā€œcloakā€ (so NAB, NRSV, NLT); CEV ā€œcape.ā€ The Hebrew noun occurs only here and in Isa 3:22. you are wearing#tn Heb ā€œwhich [is] upon youā€; NIV, NRSV ā€œyou are wearing.ā€ and grip it tightly.ā€ As she held it tightly, he measured out about sixty pounds#tn Heb ā€œand she gripped it tightly and he measured out six of barley and placed upon her.ā€ The unit of measure is not indicated in the Hebrew text, although it would probably have been clear to the original hearers of the account. Six ephahs, the equivalent of 180-300 pounds, is clearly too heavy, especially if carried in a garment. Six omers (an omer being a tenth of an ephah) seems too little, since this would have amounted to six-tenths of an ephah, less than Ruth had gleaned in a single day (cf. 2:17). Thus a seah (one third of an ephah) may be in view here; six seahs would amount to two ephahs, about 60 pounds (27 kg). See R. L. Hubbard, Jr., Ruth (NICOT), 222, and F. W. Bush, Ruth, Esther (WBC), 178. of barley into the shawl and put it on her shoulders. Then he#tc The MT preserves the 3rd person masculine singular form וַיָּבֹא (vayyavo’, ā€œthen he wentā€; cf. ASV, NAB, NIV, NCV, NRSV, NLT), while many medieval mss (supported by the Syriac and Vulgate) have the 3rd person feminine singular form וַתָּבֹא (vattavo’, ā€œthen she wentā€; cf. KJV, NASB, TEV). went into town, 16 and she returned to her mother-in-law.
Ruth Returns to Naomi
When Ruth returned to her mother-in-law, Naomi#tn Heb ā€œsheā€; the referent (Naomi) has been specified in the translation for clarity. asked,#tn Heb ā€œsaid.ā€ Since what follows is a question, the present translation uses ā€œaskedā€ here. ā€œHow did things turn out for you,#tn Heb ā€œWho are you?ā€ In this context Naomi is clearly not asking for Ruth’s identity. Here the question has the semantic force ā€œAre you his wife?ā€ See R. L. Hubbard, Jr., Ruth (NICOT), 223-24, and F. W. Bush, Ruth, Esther (WBC), 184-85. my daughter?ā€ Ruth#tn Heb ā€œsheā€; the referent (Ruth) has been specified in the translation for clarity. told her about all the man had done for her.#sn All that the man had done. This would have included his promise to marry her and his gift of barley. 17 She said, ā€œHe gave me these sixty pounds of barley, for he said to me,#tc The MT (Kethib) lacks the preposition אֵלַי (’elay, ā€œto meā€) which is attested in the marginal reading (Qere). ā€˜Do not go to your mother-in-law empty-handed.ā€™ā€#sn ā€˜Do not go to your mother-in-law empty-handed.’ In addition to being a further gesture of kindness on Boaz’s part, the gift of barley served as a token of his intention to fulfill his responsibility as family guardian. See R. L. Hubbard, Jr., Ruth (NICOT), 225-26, and F. W. Bush, Ruth, Esther (WBC), 187. 18 Then Naomi#tn Heb ā€œsheā€; the referent (Naomi) has been specified in the translation for clarity. said, ā€œStay put,#tn Heb ā€œsitā€; KJV ā€œSit stillā€; NAB ā€œWait hereā€; NLT ā€œJust be patient.ā€ my daughter, until you know how the matter turns out. For the man will not rest until he has taken care of the matter today.ā€

Terpilih Sekarang Ini:

Ruth 3: NET

Highlight

Salin

Bandingkan

Kongsi

None

Ingin menyimpan sorotan merentas semua peranti anda? Mendaftar atau log masuk