Saul: King of ExcusesExemplo

Empty Apology

In verses 22-23, Samuel condemned Saul and explained to Saul that the Lord had rejected Saul from being king because of his disobedience. The verdict was in. God was finished with Saul.

Saul’s next tactic was to offer an empty apology, as found in verse 24, where he said, “I have sinned, for I have transgressed the commandment of the Lord and your words, because I feared the people and obeyed their voice.” Note the continued justification and blame-shifting that follows the apology.

An empty apology is an apology in word only. It is an apology that is frequently followed by more blame shifting or justification of sin. Today, it is usually something like “I’m sorry, but…” As parents, we easily recognize empty apologies when our children offer a flippant “I’m sorry” when instructed to apologize. In management, we are taught to offer empty apologies to de-escalate tense situations. A classic example is a manager telling someone, “I’m sorry you feel that way.” This statement is meant to acknowledge the other person’s feelings but admits no guilt and offers no solution.

It was only after Samuel’s condemnation that Saul confessed his sin. However, he still failed to repent. Saul displayed worldly sorrow instead of godly sorrow. Worldly sorrow says, “I’m sorry I got caught.” Godly sorrow says, “I’m sorry I have sinned.” Worldly sorrow involves the external appearance only. Godly sorrow involves the heart. Saul’s confession was due to sorrow over the consequences of his sin and did not reflect true repentance. He continued to make excuses to avoid those consequences, claiming he feared the people. He confessed, but he still blamed the people.

Consider Psalm 51 and compare David's heartfelt confession reflecting his grief over his sin. How does David's repentance differ from Saul's empty apology?